Jay Dixit
  • Writing
    • The New York Times
      • Sorrow Without the Veneer
      • How Do You Save a Comedy Club?
    • Rolling Stone
    • Psychology Today
      • The Ideological Animal
      • The Art of Now
      • George Carlin’s Last Interview
      • First Loves
    • The Washington Post
      • You Are What You Buy
      • New! Improved! And Still 100 Percent Fake
    • Wired
    • My Favorites
    • The San Francisco Chronicle
      • Will Shortz, Crossword Puzzle King
  • Editing
  • Interviews
    • George Carlin’s Last Interview
    • Willem Dafoe
    • Ask the Commando: John Geddes
    • Ask the Spy: Valerie Plame
    • Tim Roth
  • Photos
  • Blog
Home » Writing » Rolling Stone » Wellesley College Statement

Arti­cle   Wellesley’s State­ment   My Response to Welles­ley   Hate Mail

STATEMENT BY WELLESLEY COLLEGE PRESIDENT IN RESPONSE TO ROLLING STONE ARTICLE

WELLESLEY, Mass., Feb­ru­ary 23, 2001 — Welles­ley Col­lege Pres­i­dent Diana Chap­man Walsh today made the fol­low­ing state­ment: “The recent arti­cle about Welles­ley Col­lege in Rolling Stone mag­a­zine is an exam­ple of irre­spon­si­ble and sen­sa­tion­al­ist jour­nal­ism, designed to sell mag­a­zines rather than inform read­ers. The depic­tions of Welles­ley Col­lege stu­dents, fac­ulty, and staff are grossly dis­torted and are an appalling affront to the intel­li­gent, hard-working, and tal­ented indi­vid­u­als who make up this cam­pus community.

Since the arti­cle has appeared, our stu­dents have reacted with appro­pri­ate out­rage at the pruri­ent depic­tion of the col­lege, which in fact places the high­est value on mutual respect and the per­sonal dig­nity of every mem­ber of our com­mu­nity. Although the arti­cle notes in a foot­note that “many names have been changed,” the reporter does not dis­tin­guish between pseu­do­nyms and real names, mak­ing it impos­si­ble to assess the valid­ity of any of the state­ments. More trou­bling still is his ten­dency to mask the iden­tity of fac­ulty and staff while he uses stu­dents’ real names, expos­ing them to pub­lic ridicule.

To pur­port to cap­ture ‘Col­lege Life 2001′ (as the mag­a­zine claimed on its cover) through sala­cious sto­ries about the alleged sex­ual adven­tures of a hand­ful of stu­dents is ludi­crous, as is the impli­ca­tion that these kinds of behav­iors are some­how endemic or unique to women’s colleges.Unfortunately, this kind of stereo­typic report­ing is noth­ing new for women’s col­leges. It is another exam­ple of the back­lash against suc­cess­ful female stu­dents who choose to attend a women’s col­lege because of the aca­d­e­mic excel­lence of its stu­dents and fac­ulty and the empow­er­ment and life­long oppor­tu­ni­ties that such an edu­ca­tion opens for them.

I am con­fi­dent that read­ers of this deplorable arti­cle will rec­og­nize it for the imma­ture and offen­sive piece of reck­less jour­nal­ism that it is. Mean­while, Welles­ley Col­lege stands proudly and securely on more than 125 years of remark­able suc­cess pro­vid­ing an excel­lent edu­ca­tion for women who make a dif­fer­ence in the world.” Office for Pub­lic Infor­ma­tion. Last mod­i­fied: March 12, 2001.

Follow me on EmailFollow me on FacebookFollow me on PicasaFollow me on Twitter

Contact

dixit*aya.yale.edu

Follow me on FacebookFollow me on FlickrFollow me on PicasaFollow me on PosterousFollow me on Twitter

Photos on flickr

Site design by JD Design